We’ve seen more and more misinformation spread in the world these past few years. And people don’t seem to think about the source of the information they are being given, or the motivation of the person giving it.
For instance, I am not a Trump fan. At all. And I see other non-Trump fans raging with stories of all the terrible things he’s done. Their motivation is fairly clear – they have an opinion and want to persuade others to agree with them. But you also see former Trump fans/associates attacking him viciously, telling stories of all the terrible things he’s done. Their motivation isn’t so clear. Did they truly witness these terrible things taking place and were so appalled that it changed their opinion of him, or did they have a falling out with him over something and broke ties? Perhaps some of what they say is merely spiteful revenge, trying to get back at someone they are angry with. They would not be the first to do it, nor the last. We see it all the time.
So we, as viewers/listeners/readers, need to sift through what is said. We need to look for evidence/proof either for or against what they are saying in order to find the kernel of truth.
People say a lot of things that aren’t true, but they aren’t necessarily lying. Maybe they don’t have all the facts and spoke too soon about what little they do know. Maybe they were misinformed themselves. And maybe they just spoke without thinking and later realized what they had said was wrong, but have no way to correct it with everyone who might have heard it – either directly from them, or from someone else who heard it and repeated it.
The same thing is true in storytelling. Whether on the screen or in print form, there are unreliable narrators – people providing information or opinions that are not at all or only partially accurate. They have reasons for doing it also, some of them innocent and some of them malicious.
I wrote a story once in which there was a conflict between a man and woman. Each was basing their actions/words on their point of view of a situation, but each was only looking at the situation from their side and not learning the full story. Some readers got very upset, saying one person was wrong and the other right, and seemed to think the story was flawed because that could never happen that someone would have such a wrong, stupid opinion. But it happens every day. If those readers stuck with the story to the end, they eventually saw each character realize that they weren’t seeing the full picture and that they had been too harsh with the other person.
It’s well worth remembering, in life and fiction, to consider the source of information. What is said, how it is said, the motivation behind it being said – all of those things and more factor in to whether that information is true and worthwhile.